Legal Opinion
Schenstrom v. Continental Machines, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 28, 1949No. Civ. No. 1404PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action to recover damages for breach of contract. Defendant pleads cancellation and counterclaims for alleged secret profits retained by plaintiff.
Plaintiff, a graduate engineer and a fluent speaker of several languages, among them Spanish, persuaded L. A. Wilkie, defendant’s chairman, to appoint Schenstrom •defendant’s representative to sell its products in Mexico for a period of six months. Defendant, a Minnesota corporation with its principal place of business in Minneapolis and factories in Savage, Minnesota, and Des Plaines, Illinois, is…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Claiborne-Reno Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Emerson v. Pacific Coast & Norway Packing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Group Association Plans, Inc. v. David B. Colquhoun and Raymond K. Tongue Co., Inc.,appellantsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- United Packinghouse Workers of America, a Labor Organization Affiliated With a.f.l.-c.i.o. v. Maurer-Neuer, Inc., a Kansas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Carlson Equipment Company v. International Harvester CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983