Legal Opinion · Dissent

Saunders v. Saunders

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 14, 1983No. B14-82-080CVPublished

1DissentMurphy, Justice

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s disposition of the first two points of error concerning hearsay and due process. I agree with the conclusion reached by the majority with respect to point of error three, the absence of the Sixth Amendment right of confrontation in a U.R.E.S.A. proceeding, but I would amplify the reasoning and include citations to specific authority which supports that reasoning. I concur with the disposition of points of error four and five.

By way of background, Texas has adopted the U.R.E.S.A., which is codified in Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 21.01 et seq. (Vernon 1975).…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Porter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Commonwealth v. ShafferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Boriack v. BoriackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API