Legal Opinion

Mathieson Alkali Works, Inc. v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 17, 1927PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChichester, J.

These two actions of trespass on the case in assumpsit were instituted by the Mathieson Alkali Works, Incorporated (hereafter designated as plaintiff), in the Law and Equity Court of the city of Richmond, one of the nisi prius courts of this Commonwealth, one against the Norfolk and Western Railway Company, Southern Railway Company and Carolina, Clinehfield and Ohio Railway Company, the other against the Norfolk and Western Railway Company and Southern Railway Company, common carriers of freight, all doing interstate and intrastate business in the State of Virginia.

The cases are being heard…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Great Northern Railway Co. v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. T. R. Miller Mill Co. v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. National Pole Co. v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Montana Horse Products Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. City of Norfolk v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1955
  3. Alexandria Water Co. v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  4. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Commonwealth v. Old Dominion Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API