Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Papina

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1888No. 1277PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the District Court of the State of Nevada, Lincoln County. A: L. Fitzgerald, District Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Leonard, O. J.:

This is an action to recover damages for an alleged trespass upon certain unsurveyed public lands, known as the “ Pines,” and for equitable relief by injunction. Plaintiff’s allegations of ownership, possession, and right of possession of the locus in quo at the time of the alleged trespass, and his allegation of damages, are denied in the answer. Defendant alleges ownership, possession, and right of possession in himself. Plaintiff recovered judgment for one dollar, damages, and defendant was perpetually enjoined from “using or diverting any of the water upon,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Ah ChewNevada Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Rosina v. TrowbridgeNevada Supreme Court · 1888
  3. More, Reynolds & Co. v. LottNevada Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Caples v. Central Pacific RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Love v. Mt. Oddie United Mines Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API