Legal Opinion

Mulvaney v. Napolitano

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 25, 1995No. 94-277-APublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This case came before the Supreme Court on May 18, 1995, pursuant to an order that directed defendant, Stephen T. Napolitano, Treasurer of the City of Providence, and plaintiff, Elizabeth Mulvaney, to appear and show cause why the issues raised by this appeal should not be summarily decided. In this case, the defendant appealed from the granting of a writ of mandamus ordering the defendant to pay to the plaintiff post-judgment interest and costs.

After hearing the arguments of counsel and reviewing the memoranda submitted by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Andrade v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
  2. Gott v. NorbergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  3. Fosbre v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Director of Public WorksSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  5. In Re ShermanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. L.A. Ray Realty v. Town Council of the Town of CumberlandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  2. Lucius v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Graff v. MottaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  4. Maryland State Highway Administration v. KimCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Reagan Construction Corp. v. MayerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API