Legal Opinion
United States v. Marsh
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 20, 1990No. 89-20035-01PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
EARL E. O’CONNOR, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court on mov-ant James Lamont Marsh’s pro se motion for relief from sentencing pursuant to Rule 35(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. On June 27, 1989, Marsh pled guilty to three counts of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 involving the sale of microwave popcorn vending machines. On August 14, 1989, Marsh was sentenced to three years on each count pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4205(a), which the court ordered to run consecutively. On December 5, 1989, movant filed a motion pursuant to Rule 35(b) to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fred J. Wellnitz v. Ray H. Page, Warden, Oklahoma State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Robert Estrada, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Dan Hedman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alderman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- United States v. HollenbeckDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1996