Legal Opinion

In Re Riverbank Canning Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 4, 1938No. Patent Appeal 3882Published

1Opinion of the Court

95 F.2d 327 (1938)

In re RIVERBANK CANNING CO.

Patent Appeal No. 3882.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 4, 1938.

Jackson & Webster, of San Francisco, Cal. (Charles R. Allen and William G. MacKay, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

R. F. Whitehead, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, affirming that of the Examiner refusing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crane v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. In Re Riverbank Canning Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  3. In re Maclin-Zimmer-McGill Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920
  4. J. P. Heilbronn Co. v. Hammermill Paper Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  5. In re Ric-WiL Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API