Legal Opinion

Szwast Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1958No. Appeal, No. 35PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

This is an appeal in an unemployment compensation case. The appellant was last employed by the Martinsburg Shoe Company as a die cutter. She had taken a one week vacation and had asked her employer for an additional week. This was refused and she was notified by her employer that if she took this unauthorized vacation period away from work she would be dismissed from her job.

Despite this warning and direct order from her employer she took cf. the additional week without justification or notification to her employer. On her return to work she was immediately discharged…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Bag & Paper Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Armstrong Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Antinopoulas Unemployment Compensation Case Ambridge Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McAlister v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Jimenez v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. DevlinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Lipovsky v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API