Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Bibb

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1870PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from tbe Probate Court of Montgomery. Tried before Hon. George Ely. Tbe facts upon which the ease turns are set out in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtB. F. Saffold, J.

The appellees, upon affidavit, reciting that the appellants were justly indebted to them four hundred dollars for services as agricultural laborers, and that a portion of the crops cultivated by them had been removed from the premises, whereon they were grown, without full payment of all wages due, obtained an attachment returnable to the probate court. This attachment was levied on four bales of cotton, in the possession of Lehman, Durr & Co., who were also summoned as garnishees. The cause was tried by the probate court and judgment rendered against the defendants, the entry of which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tims v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  2. Boring v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
  3. Allen v. HarperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  4. Bancroft v. StantonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
  5. Ex parte HaughtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1863

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Henderson by Hartsfield v. Alabama PowerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Alford v. State ex rel. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Smith v. SchulteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Gilbreath Ex Rel. Watson v. WallaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  5. Ex Parte MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API