Legal Opinion

Department of Transportation v. Mastrangelo

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 18, 1997No. 96-674PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The order of default entered against the Department of Transportation (DOT) is reversed because “[i]t is fundamental that when a party against whom affirma*644tive relief is sought has appeared in' any action by filing or serving ‘papers,’ that party shall be served with notice of the application for default as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.500(b).” Yellow Jacket Marina, Inc. v. Paletti, 670 So.2d 170, 171 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). International Energy Corp. v. Hackett, 687 So.2d 941 (Fla. 3d DCA Feb. 12, 1997); Maranto v. Dearborn, 687 So.2d 940 (Fla. 3d DCA Feb. 12, 1997); Clark v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fierro v. LewisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. International Energy Corp. v. HackettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. Carillon Corp. v. DevickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. Yellow Jacket Marina, Inc. v. PalettiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  5. Clark v. PerlmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. GREEN SOLUTIONS INTERN., INC. v. GilliganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Molina v. WatkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API