Legal Opinion
Pryor v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided March 9, 1966PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Creson
The parties will hereinafter be referred to as they appeared in the Trial Court; that is, plaintiff in error, George Monroe Pryor, as the defendant, and the defendant in error as the State.
On December 29, 1964, the defendant was indicted for the alleged rape of one Dorothy Mae Miller, on January 18,1964, and for feloniously, carnally knowing and abusing said Dorothy Mae Miller. The defendant was tried pursuant to the above indictment on April 5, 6 and 7, 1965. The jury found the defendant guilty of unlawful carnal knowledge of a female under twelve years of age, as charged in the second count…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Spano v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Webster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1967
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
- Hancock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1968
- Chadwick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1968
- Palmer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1968
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.