Keisel v. Baldock
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; . W. R. Taylor, Judge. Action by Nancy E. Baldock against Harry C. Keisel and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and the defendant named brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
GALBRAITH, C.
Nancy E. Baldock commenced this action in the trial court against the plaintiff in error and defendants in error Floyd H. Skirvin and W. B. Skirvin for money had and received. A jury was waived, and the cause was tried to the court, and a finding made in favor of the plaintiff, and judgment rendered for the amount claimed against the plaintiff in error. From that judgment an appeal has been prosecuted to this court by petition in error and case-made.
It appears from the record that the defendant in error, Mrs. Baldock, was the owner of three promissory notes for $2,500…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ayer v. HutchinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
- Mee v. CarlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- First National Bank of St. Paul v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
- Hall v. HaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831
- Jenkins v. Planters' & Mechanics' BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- A. A. Murphy, Inc. v. BanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Dunkin v. Waurika Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917