Legal Opinion

State v. Stromquist

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1981No. 17553PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant in this ease was charged in the circuit court with “disturbing an official meeting” under U.C.A., 1953, 76-8-304(1). She was found guilty and placed on retroactive probation. Probation having been satisfactorily fulfilled as of the time it was imposed, the court then dismissed the case.

The case was appealed to the district court on the ground the statute involved was unconstitutional for vagueness, which point also11 had been urged in the circuit court. 1 The district court dismissed the appeal on the grounds the issue raised was moot, relying on our recent pronouncement in…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Baird v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Duran v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Maxwell v. GibsonUtah Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Utah Transit Authority v. Local 382 of the Amalgamated Transit UnionUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Merhish v. H. A. Folsom & AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. SimsUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Cache County v. Property Tax Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Black v. Alpha Financial Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API