Legal Opinion

Pegram v. Hebding

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 11, 1995No. 1940432PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, Harvey L. Pegram, appeals from a judgment entered on a directed verdict for the defendant, William J. Hebding, in this action to recover damages based on allegations of fraud and intentional interference with an employment contract. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

The evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to Pegram, seeFirst Financial Insurance Co. v. Tillery, 626 So.2d 1252 (Ala. 1993) (discussing the well-established standard for reviewing directed verdicts), indicates the following: In 1983, Pegram, Hebding, and another person left their management…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Henson v. Celtic Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Baker v. BennettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. First Financial Ins. Co. v. TillerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Hickman v. Winston County Hosp. Bd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Watters v. Lawrence CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. White Sands Group, L.L.C. v. Prs II, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  3. Dawkins v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  4. Stallworth v. AmSouth Bank of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  5. Brooks v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API