Legal Opinion

People v. Machado

New York County Courts

Decided March 28, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn F. Scileppi, J.

Defendant moves for a writ of error coram nobis and for an order correcting defendant’s sentence.

He urges three separate grounds for such relief.

First, that at the time he was sentenced'as a second felony offender under this indictment, he was in fact and in law a first offender and not subject to the additional punishment imposed pursuant to section 1941 of the Penal Law.

Second, that the out-of-State offense described in the prior offense information which formed the basis for sentencing defendant as a second felony offender in this court, was not in fact or in law an offense which would…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. OlahNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Stephens v. ToomeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People v. SadnessNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People v. ClappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. MachadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  2. People v. WeinbergerNew York Court of Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API