Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 2001No. A093924PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1321Opinion

HAERLE, J.

I. Introduction

Petitioner Arlene Robertson (Robertson) seeks a writ of mandate to overturn an order of the trial court overruling her demurrer to real party’s second amended complaint. That complaint implicated title to real property, including Robertson’s home, in Marin County, and her demurrer was based on statute of limitations grounds. In overruling it, the trial court held that an action under Civil Code section 3412 to cancel “a wholly void instrument can be brought at any time,” i.e., is not subject to any statute of limitations. We issued an order to show cause and,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Moss v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Zakaessian v. ZakaessianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Estate of PieperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Duty v. Abex Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nielsen v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Costa Serena Owners Coalition v. Costa Serena Architectural CommitteeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Aurora Commercial Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  5. Gold v. National Default Servicing CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API