Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. Funge

California Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1930No. Docket No. S.F. 13365PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This is an appeal by defendant from a joint judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiffs in three actions, originating in the same controversy, which had been consolidated for trial. These actions grew out of an alleged breach of contract for the construction of a two-story dwelling-house in the residential district of San Francisco, known as St. Francis Wood. Due to disagreement which- arose between the defendant owner, W. W. Funge, Jr., and the principal contractors, McIntosh Bros., shortly after the commencement of building operations, the building was never completed. Action 173914 was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Humboldt Lumber Mill Co. v. CrispCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Johnson v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Pilstrand v. GreenamyreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. Watson v. Alta Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. Kern v. San Francisco Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nolte v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Borden v. DaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. McDonald v. FiliceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Marquette v. Housing Authority of OpelousasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. In Re Smith's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API