Legal Opinion

Venanzi v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 2, 1979No. Appeal, No. 130 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson, Jr.,

In this appeal, petitioner (claimant) challenges the finding of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) that he is ineligible for benefits because his discharge was for willful misconduct pursuant to Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802(e). We affirm.

Claimant, a truck driver,, was discharged and subsequently denied unemployment compensation benefits on the basis of his involvement in three accidents with company trucks during a period of about…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kentucky Fried Chicken of Altoona, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Schappe v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Israel v. Virginia Employment CommissionCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  2. Frazier v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API