Merchants' Bank & Trust Co. v. Bushnell
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM HAMILTON. Appeal from tlie Chancery Court of Hamilton County. —Hon. W. B. Gaevin, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the Court
Me. Ci-iiee Justice Lansden
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This hill was filed by the bank to recover of the defendant, Bushnell, the sum of $1,500, upon the following' facts: A. B. Guy and IT. Bushnell executed a note to complainant on December 8, 1916, for the sum of $1,500, which stipulated, among other things, that the bank might apply all securities at the maturity of the note, or otherwise, on deposit for its payment “to the payment of this note on any other indebtedness due said bank by said parties, or any of them.” Otherwise the note was an ordinary note which Bushnell signed, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. Kaw Boiler Works Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Spire v. SpireSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Graham v. ShephardTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dixon v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
- Clifford v. West Hartford Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1931
- Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. ChotinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Simson v. Bilderbeck, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Commercial Casualty Ins. v. Petroleum Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.