Legal Opinion

Erskine v. Erskine

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1948No. Civ. 3587PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

This is a proceeding to determine heirship, which arose over a controversy between appellant, Jessie M. Erskine, widow of James E. Erskine, deceased, and respondent Frances N. Erskine, his only child by a previous marriage. Frances’s mother and father were married in 1900. The mother died in 1935. Jessie and James Erskine were married in 1941.

In 1937, Helen M. Keller and Mr. Erskine became equal partners in the “Calwa Water Works,” which partnership continued until the death of Mr. Erskine on March 4, 1946. On December 24, 1942, Erskine executed a will providing in part as follows:

“Fourth. I…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of DwyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. McDonald v. HuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Whitney v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Holman v. TotenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Estate of ClineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Greco v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Washington Escrow Co. v. BlairWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Shure v. DahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  4. In Re Iversen's WillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Zeigler v. Hathaway Ranch Partnership (In Re Hathaway Ranch Partnership)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API