Legal Opinion
PT Indonesia Epson Industry v. Orient Overseas Container Line, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided May 17, 2002No. 99-3373-CIVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Amended Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment Against Orient Overseas Container Line
JORDAN, District Judge.
For the reasons set forth below, the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment against Orient Overseas Container Line [D.E .30] is DENIED.
Summary Judgment Standard
Summary judgment “shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Allen v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Hilburn v. Murata Electronics North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Swift Textiles, Inc. v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Regal-Beloit Corp. v. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- REGAL-BELOIT CORP. v. KAWASAKI Kisen KaishCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Regal-Beloit Corporation v. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Regal-Beloit Corporation v. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009