Legal Opinion
Raef v. Appellate Division of the Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 30, 2015No. B259792PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, P. J.
Paul Raef was charged with two violations of Vehicle Code section 40008, subdivision (a), 1 which increases the punishment for reckless driving and other traffic offenses committed with the intent to capture an image, sound recording, or other physical impression of another person for a commercial purpose. The trial court sustained Raef s demurrer and dismissed the charges on tire ground that the statute was unconstitutional. The Appellate Division of the Los Angeles County Superior Court reversed. Raef petitioned for a writ of mandate, and on direction by the California…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jenni Rivera Enters., LLC v. Latin World Entm't Holdings, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. Williams, California Court of Appeal, 2nd District2016
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Jenni Rivera Enterprises v. Latin World Entertainment etc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- People v. OrtegaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.