Legal Opinion

Spinney v. Hall

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1912No. 7,459PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action by Edmon G. Hall and others, as receivers of the Goodland Bank, against Arthur J. Spinney and another. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

On February 24, 1909, appellees Hall, Griggs and Wilds, as receivers of the Goodland Bank, commenced this action to enforce payment of two notes, payable to the order of Baldwin & Dague, and executed by Arthur J. Spinney and Charles Spinney, in the name of Spinney Brothers.

Appellants answered in three paragraphs. The first and third paragraphs were withdrawn, and the court sustained a demurrer to the second paragraph.. Appellants refused to plead further, and judgment was rendered in favor of said receivers for the amount of the notes and attorneys’ fees.

Appellants’ assignments of errors…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nichols v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Porter v. RosemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. American Mutual Life Insurance v. MasonIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Proctor v. ColeIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Runner v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lippitt v. Thames Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  2. Chosnek v. RolleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Zechiel v. Firemen's Fund Ins.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
  4. Anderson v. BiggsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API