Legal Opinion
Amana Refrigeration, Inc. v. Quadlux, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 5, 1999No. 98-1200PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Chief Judge.
Amana Refrigeration, Inc. (“Amana”) appeals the order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa in Amana Refrigeration, Inc. v. Quadlux, Inc., No. 96-CV-350 (N.D.Iowa Dec. 24, 1997), which granted Quadlux, Inc.’s (“Quadlux”) motion to dismiss Ama-na’s action seeking declaratory and injunc-tive relief pertaining to the validity and infringement of Quadlux’s U.S. Patent No. 5,517,005 (the “ ’005 patent”), and damages for defamation and trade libel. We affirm.
Background
Quadlux, a California corporation with its principal place of business in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Preiser v. NewkirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Beverly Hills Fan Company v. Royal Sovereign Corp. And Ultec Enterprises Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- The Akro Corporation v. Ken LukerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Bp Chemicals Limited v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Metabolite Laboratories, Inc. And Competitive Technologies, Inc. v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (Doing Business as Labcorp)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Electronics for Imaging, Inc. v. Jan R. Coyle and Kolbet LabsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Silent Drive, Inc. v. Strong Industries, Inc. And Brooks StrongCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Fort James Corporation v. Solo Cup CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Benitec Australia, Ltd. v. Nucleonics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.