Legal Opinion

Boardman v. Dorsett

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 24, 1984No. 5674-1-IIIPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

Mr. and Mrs. Dorsett appeal a summary judgment requiring them to pay the balance of the contract price on a home they purchased from Wesley and Virginia Boardman. They contend summary judgment should not have been granted because (1) genuine issues of material fact exist as to an alleged agreement to withhold $1,000 pending Mr. Boardman's completion of certain construction and an alleged breach of the warranty of habitability; and (2) the court erred in granting prejudgment interest at the rate of 12 percent. The Boardmans counter by contending the appeal should be dismissed because it was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Wagner v. WagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Klos v. GockelWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Noel v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Rosellini v. BancheroWashington Supreme Court · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Thomas v. Ruddell Lease-Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  4. Honolulu Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. MurphyHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Luxon v. CaviezelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API