Taylor v. Deese

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). It is earnestly insisted by counsel for appellant that the judgment must be reversed because the circuit court erred in admitting parol evidence to show that appellees signed the note to the bank under tbe promises of its cashier that tbe note would not become effective until tbe bank took a mortgage from C. F. Deese, tbe principal in tbe note, upon a certain tract of land, and that this condition was never'performed by tbe ¡bank. It is contended that tbe admission of this testimony violated tbe well-known rule that parol evidence is not admissible when…