Tunica-Biloxi Indians v. Pecot
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM RULING
LITTLE, District Judge.
Before the court is a [doc. no. 257] motion for partial summary judgment filed by defendants F.L. Crane & Sons, Inc. (“F.L.Crane”) and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (“Liberty”). F.L. Crane and Liberty have filed three supporting memoranda and plaintiff, Tunica-Biloxi Indians of Louisiana d/b/a Paragon Casino Resort (“Tunica-Biloxi Indians” or “the tribe”), has filed two opposing memoranda. For the following reasons, F.L. Crane and Liberty’s motion for partial summary judgment is granted.
FACTUAL AND LEGAL BACKGROUND
This case involves a construction…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- National Farmers Union Insurance v. Crow Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tunica-Biloxi Indians of Louisiana v. PecotDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2004