Shelden v. Estate of Warner
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Chippewa. (Steere, J.) The facts and nature of the case are fully stated in the opinions.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.
Plaintiffs having established a claim against the estate of Ebenezer Warner, before the commis•sioners, it was rejected on appeal before the circuit court for Chippewa county, and that decision comes before us on error.
The claim is for a balance remaining due after a sale under a mortgage decree. The foreclosure suit was brought upon a mortgage given by Warner, to Hansom Shelden and Columbus C. Douglass, who were his boudsmen as receiver of the' United States Land-Office. The mortgage was conditioned *448that Warner should “pay, or canse to be paid, all such sums of money, dues, or demands for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fish v. MorseMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Clark v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Haldane v. SweetMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Barry v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Shelden v. WarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by5 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. ErbMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Vaughan v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Peoples Savings Bank v. GeistertMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Grece v. HelmMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Union Guardian Trust Co. v. Building Securities Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937