Legal Opinion

Hill v. Clayton

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided April 16, 1992No. 13-91-234-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

A jury awarded appellant damages for personal injuries resulting from an assault and from appellee Clayton’s negligence. The jury imputed no negligence to appellee S.W. Bell Telephone Company (Bell). The trial court denied appellant’s motion for new trial, from which he now appeals by eleven points of error, claiming that the jury’s damage award and its finding that Bell was not liable were against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence and were the result of jury bias, passion, prejudice, or other improper motive. He further complains of improperly…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Edmondson v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. Del Carmen Alarcon v. Circe, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
  4. Cortez v. Medical Protective Co. of Ft. WayneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Gray v. Floyd, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Beauchamp v. Hambrick, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1995
  2. Hilland v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Horton v. Denny's Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2003
  4. Municipal Administrative Services, Inc. v. City of Beaumont, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
  5. Nicolau v. State Farm Lloyds, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API