Legal Opinion
Hilland v. Arnold
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 25, 1993No. 6-93-013-CVPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Grant, justice.
Phillip A. Hilland appeals from a judgment in his favor in his personal injury action against Herman Harvey Arnold. In his sole point of error, Hilland contends that the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion for a new trial because the award of damages in the judgment goes against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence. Hilland’s complaint is that this jury award was too low.
BACKGROUND
On July 7, 1990, a vehicle driven by Arnold struck the back of a vehicle driven by Hilland on Richmond Road in Texarkana. Arnold had been distracted by a woman…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Six Flags Over Texas, Inc. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Kulms v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Texas & N. O. R. v. BarhamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Allright, Inc. v. StrawderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Texarkana Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. MurdockTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Akins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Hong v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Beauchamp v. Hambrick, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1995
- Otis Spunkmeyer, Inc. v. Blakely, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.