Legal Opinion · Dissent

Willie Sampson v. Jack Palmer

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 6, 2015No. 14-15648Unpublished

1DissentTallman, Circuit Judge

We stumble over the same stone yet again. In reversing the Nevada Supreme Court’s denial of habeas relief following a two-day evidentiary hearing, our court ignores the deferential provisions of the An-titerrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AÉDPA), Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 (codified as amended at 28 *479U.S.C. § 2241 et seq.). Because the majority impermissibly substitutes its own opinion for the Nevada Supreme Court’s finding of no prejudice under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), I respectfully dissent.

The issue before us is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Leif Taylor v. Thomas M. Maddox, Interim Director George Galaza Cal TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Lopez v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Glebe v. FrostSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API