Legal Opinion
Casey v. Peco Foods, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided April 17, 2003No. CIV.A. 4:02CV415LNPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TOM S. LEE, Chief Judge.
This cause is before the court on the motion of defendants Peco Foods, Inc. and Marshall Durbin Farms, Inc. for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Candy Casey has responded in opposition to the motion. The court, considering the memoranda and submissions of the parties, as well as other pertinent authorities, finds that the motion is well taken and should be granted.
Casey was employed at defendant Marshall Durbin Farms as a broiler clerk until June 2000, when the operation was sold to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Browning Manufacturing v. Mims (In Re Coastal Plains, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Walter Burnes v. Pemco AeroplexCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Faye Brandon v. Interfirst Corporation, and John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Rosenshein v. KlebanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Robson v. Texas Eastern Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re WalkerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
- In re ProchnowUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2011
- Benton v. Ryan's Family SteakhouseDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2004
- Rumore v. Wamstad (In Re Waddell)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.