Legal Opinion
Vergato v. Commercial Union Insurance
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided February 6, 2001No. 98-P-716PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRapoza, J.
The plaintiff filed a declaratory action in Superior Court seeking a determination that Commercial Union Insurance Company (Commercial) owed him coverage for injuries suffered in a motor vehicle accident. The plaintiff and Commercial filed cross motions for summary judgment. Following the entry of judgment in favor of Commercial, the plaintiff appealed. We affirm.
Background. In 1994, Gail Vergato owned a 1988 Ford Mustang that was listed on an automobile insurance policy *825she had purchased from Commercial.1 She selected additional coverage under Part 5 of the policy entitled “Optional Bodily…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- USM Corp. v. Arthur D. Little Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- Bilodeau v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- City of Boston v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- White v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Foisy v. Royal MacCabees Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Ellis v. City of MartinsvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. DevlinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Ideal Financial Services, Inc. v. ZichelleMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Peters v. United National InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.