Legal Opinion

Bryan Rozengard v. Michael Burgess

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided December 23, 2025No. 1:25-cv-00848Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ______ BRYAN ROZENGARD, Petitioner, Case No. 1:25-cv-848 v. Honorable Maarten Vermaat MICHAEL BURGESS, Respondent. ____________________________/ OPINION This is a habeas corpus action brought by a state prisoner under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Court will grant Petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.1 (ECF No. 4.) The Court will also grant Petitioner’s motion (ECF No. 12) for expedited review of his recent supplemental brief (ECF No. 11). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Rule 73 of the Federal Rules…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API