Legal Opinion

Hutchens v. Latimer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1854PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the Bartholomew Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.

Assumpsit by Latimer, Jenkins, & Co., against Hutchens and others, on a promissory note. Upon, the calling of the cause, the defendants filed their affidavit, the main point of which was, that the only service of summons was by copy; that but one copy was left at the house where two of the defendants resided, one of them as a boarder in the family of the other; setting out such copy in hcec verba. Such is also the substance of the sheriff’s return on the summons, as appears elsewhere in the record. *68The defendants thereupon moved the Court to set aside the service, and continue for process,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Idlewine v. Madison County Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Serrano v. BerdielSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1915
  3. Allburn v. State Ex Rel. Warrick County Sheriff's DepartmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Serrano v. BerdielSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API