Connecticut Steel Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and Order
CARMAN, Judge.
This matter is before this Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Judgment on the Agency Record Pursuant to Rule 56.2. This Court, having considered Plaintiffs’ Motion and memorandum in support thereof, Defendant’s and Defendants-In-tervenor’s responses, Plaintiffs’ reply, the Administrative Record, and all other papers submitted herein, finds that the International Trade Commission’s (“ITC”) negative preliminary determination was not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law. Therefore, Plaintiffs’ Motion is denied.
Procedura…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- American Lamb Company v. The United States, and New Zealand Meat Products Board, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- General Motors Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- Calabrian Corp. v. United States International Trade CommissionUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nucor Fastener Division v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Celanese Chemicals Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- U.S. Aluminum Extruders Coal. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2025