Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Co. v. Buntin

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1939No. Civil No. 4052PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

— William B. Buntin, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against the Southern Pacific Company, hereinafter called defendant, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged by plaintiff to have been sustained as the result of negligence of defendant. The case was tried to a jury which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff, and thereafter this appeal was taken.

The second amended complaint, on which the case was tried, may be summarized as follows: The plaintiff was a traveler on a train operated by defendant, his destination being Tucson, Arizona. The train arrived in Tucson about…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Brown v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Junkermann v. . Tilyou Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. East Line & Red River Railway Co. v. RushingTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Benson v. Northland Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. L. & N. R. R. v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McBride v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Nunez v. Professional Transit Management of Tucson, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Yu v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  4. Pucci v. Carnival Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
  5. Adiutori v. Sky Harbor International AirportDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API