Legal Opinion

Bardusch v. Hofbeck

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 13, 1947No. Docket 147/293PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This is a bill for specific performance. Defendants had listed their home for sale with Mr. Gutleber, a real estate broker, and had set the price at $13,000. Complainant, who was so informed by the broker, told him that he would buy the house at that price and instructed him to pay a deposit and to prepare a contract of sale. Gutleber called on defendants, told them of complainant's decision, paid them $100 and took their signed receipt which reads as follows:

"Received from William E. Bardusch of 84 Maplewood Avenue, Maplewood, Essex County, New Jersey, the sum of $100 (one hundred dollars)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martindell v. Fiduciary Counsel, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
  2. Moran v. Fifteenth Ward B. L. Assn.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  3. Hardy v. HangenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  4. Martindell v. Fiduciary Counsel, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Looman Realty Corp. v. BROAD ST. NAT. BK., TRENTONNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API