Legal Opinion

Atkins v. Holsum Cafeteria, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 15, 1935No. 15012PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Council for plaintiff, in application' for rehearing, vigorously assert that our .interpretation of paragraph 3 of section 1 of Act No. 20 of 1914 is unsound, and that it was the puipose of the framers of that paragraph to permit a claim for compensation whenever the occupation of the employer is hazardous, regardless of whether the occupation is included within the various ones classified as hazardous under subparagraph (a) of paragraph 2 of section 1 and irrespective of whether the employer and employee have previously agreed that the employment shall be governed by the compensation act and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Crescent Forwarding & Transp. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Foret v. Paul Zibilich Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Smith V. Marine Oil Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Adams v. Hicks Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Gaughan v. J. J. Lips, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Claiborne v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Stephens v. CatalanoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Prevost v. Felix's Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Robbins v. Caraway-Rhodes Veterinary HospitalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API