Atkins v. Holsum Cafeteria, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Per curiam
Council for plaintiff, in application' for rehearing, vigorously assert that our .interpretation of paragraph 3 of section 1 of Act No. 20 of 1914 is unsound, and that it was the puipose of the framers of that paragraph to permit a claim for compensation whenever the occupation of the employer is hazardous, regardless of whether the occupation is included within the various ones classified as hazardous under subparagraph (a) of paragraph 2 of section 1 and irrespective of whether the employer and employee have previously agreed that the employment shall be governed by the compensation act and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richardson v. Crescent Forwarding & Transp. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Foret v. Paul Zibilich Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Smith V. Marine Oil Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Adams v. Hicks Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- Gaughan v. J. J. Lips, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
3Cited by4 opinions
- Claiborne v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
- Stephens v. CatalanoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
- Prevost v. Felix's Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
- Robbins v. Caraway-Rhodes Veterinary HospitalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974