Legal Opinion

Harold S. Hobson v. Cyrus S. Eaton

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 20, 1968No. 17480_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

CECIL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Harold S. Hobson, plaintiff-appellee, brought this action against Cyrus S. Eaton and the Cleveland Trust Co., in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, for a declaratory judgment (Section 2201, Title 28, U.S.C.) that he is the beneficial owner of certain claims against the Estate of Frank H. Hobson. The deceased, Frank H. Hobson, was not related to the plaintiff-appellee, Harold S. Hobson, either by family or through business. The District Court granted judgment to the plaintiff-appellee and the defendant-appellant,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bolles v. Toledo Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Beadle v. ColeIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Mabley & Carew Co. v. BordenOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Ellis v. Victor Electric Products, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Renee v. Sanders, Exr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API