Legal Opinion
State v. Gillispie
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 16, 2019No. A163833 (Control); A163834PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
*68*704Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for manslaughter in the first degree, ORS 163.118, and possession of a destructive device, ORS 166.382. After the trial court denied defendant's motion to suppress, he entered a conditional guilty plea to both charges while reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion. ORS 135.335(3). On appeal, he assigns error to the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress, arguing that the detectives unlawfully interrogated him in violation of both Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution and the Fifth Amendment to the United States…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. ShevyakovCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. Delgado-RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026