Legal Opinion

Pablo Espin, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, et al. v. Citibank, N.A.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided March 23, 2026No. 5:22-cv-00383Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:22-CV-383-M PABLO ESPIN, on behalf ofhimselfand _) others similarly situated, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ORDER V. ) ) CITIBANK, N.A., ) ) Defendant. ) This matter comes before the court on Defendant Citibank, N.A.’s (“Citibank”) renewed motion to compel arbitration and to stay action, pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act,

9 U.S.C. §§ 1

et seq. [DE-84]. Plaintiffs Pablo Espin, Nicholas Padao, Jeremy Bell, and Keith Taylor, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, (collectively,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chorley Enterprises, Inc. v. Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  3. Samuel Muriithi v. Shuttle Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  4. American Express Co. v. KoernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Sharp Electronics Corporation v. Deutsche Financial Services CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API