Legal Opinion

Hedlund v. Shinn

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided August 24, 2020No. 2:19-cv-05751Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Charles Michael Hedlund, No. CV-19-05751-PHX-DLR 10 Petitioner, ORDER 11 v. DEATH PENALTY CASE 12 David Shinn, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 15 16 Petitioner Charles Hedlund has filed a second-in-time Petition for Writ of Habeas 17 Corpus. (Doc. 1.) The Court ordered Respondents to file a response to Hedlund’s argument 18 that the petition was not a second or successive petition requiring authorization from the 19 Ninth Circuit under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). Respondents filed a response to which 20 Hedlund…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API