Legal Opinion

Brother International Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided April 29, 2005No. Consol. 00-00006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CARMAN, District Judge.

The matter before this Court follows a bench trial held on February 9, 2005. At issue is whether Plaintiffs miselassification of certain multifunction centers (“MFCs” 1 or “subject merchandise”) was due to mistake of fact or mistake of law. Plaintiff Brother International Corporation (“Plaintiff’ or “Brother”) challenges the United States Customs Service’s, now organized as the United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (“Customs” or “Defendant”), denial of two protests to reliqui-date thirty-eight entries of MFCs, claiming miselassification due to a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Ford Motor Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. Hambro Automotive Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  4. Aviall of Texas, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. G & R Produce Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brother International Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Hynix Semiconductor America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  3. Morris Costumes, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  4. Harak v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API