Legal Opinion

Hughson v. National Grange Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 5, 1985PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

An insurer may effectively cancel its policy by mailing a notice of cancellation to the address shown on the policy, provided that it submits sufficient proof of mailing, regardless of whether the notice is actually received by the insured (Olesky v Travelers Ins. Co., 72 AD2d 924, 925). Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313 (1) (b) states that “[a] copy of a notice of termination and the certificate of mailing, when kept in the regular course of the insurer’s business, shall constitute conclusive proof of compliance with the mailing requirements of this chapter”. Inasmuch as the record does not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Olesky v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brelsford v. USAAAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Pressman v. Warwick InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Makawi v. Commercial Union InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Meutsch v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Montefiore Medical Center v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API