Legal Opinion
Gloria Loza v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 3, 1997No. 96-70697Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
122 F.3d 1072
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Gloria LOZA, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 96-70697.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted August 25, 1997.**
Decided Sept. 3, 1997.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Laurence G. Limsico v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Arnel Gabriel ASTRERO, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Travis Murphy v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Jose Hernandez-Luis v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Hurn Bu Roe v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.