Legal Opinion

State v. Howe

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1981No. Crim. 569-APublished

1Opinion of the Court

308 N.W.2d 743 (1981)

The STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Henry H. HOWE, a/k/a Henry H. Howe, Jr., Defendant and Appellant.

Crim. No. 569-A.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

July 23, 1981.

Mikal Simonson, State's Atty., Valley City, for plaintiff and appellee; argued by Simonson. Appearance by Thomas Goven, Senior Law Student.

Hjellum, Weiss, Nerison, Jukkala & Wright, Jamestown, and Stephen Pevar, Denver, Colo., for defendant and appellant; argued by Stephen Pevar, Denver, Colo. Appearance by Henry Howe, Grand Forks, and Charles M. Carvell, Jamestown.

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

The…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Pederson; Concurrence · Hatch; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API