Legal Opinion
ACLI Government Securities, Inc. v. Rhoades
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 17, 1993No. 81 Civ. 2555(MEL)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
ACLI Government Securities, Inc., now known as Fuji Securities, Inc. (“ACLI”), moves for a judgment pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 37 and 69(a) and CPLR 411 and 3017(b), declaring that an entity named “Holly Ventures,” a purported partnership among the respondents Daniel Rhoades, Milton Braten and Lewis Henkind, is not a partnership, and for an Order directing the sale at public auction of each of the one-third interests of Rhoades and Braten in Holly Ventures and the distribution of the proceeds of that sale to ACLI in partial satisfaction of ACLI’s outstanding judgments…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In re the Accounting of the Marine Midland Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Ramirez v. GoldbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- In re the Accounting of the Marine Midland Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- M.I.F. Securities Co. v. R. C. Stamm & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- M.I.F. Securities Co. v. R.C. Stamm & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Four Star Capital Corp. v. Nynex Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Evans v. State of Conn.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
- ACLI Government Securities, Inc. v. RhoadesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Government v. RhoadesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Rosenfeld v. KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.