Legal Opinion

Dueringer v. Klocke

New York County Courts

Decided July 15, 1914PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to set aside a verdict.

1Opinion of the CourtLaing, J.

The issue involved in this action is as to whether or not the plaintiffs are still entitled to the interest in their mother’s estate given them by her will. Under the mother’s will the sons were not beneficiaries. Shortly after the mother’s death the children met at the residence of one of the defendants, read the will, and finally at the same meeting the will was destroyed. The next day, as claimed by the defendants, and within a few days, as claimed by the plaintiffs, the defendant Charles A. Klocke presented to the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs signed, a paper wherein they “ agree to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re the Appraisal, Under the Transfer Tax Act, of the Estate of LansingNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Defreese v. LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Burritt v. . SillimanNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  4. Minehan v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  5. In re the Appraisal of the Estate of RipleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martin v. McGrathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. In re the Estate of MatthiessenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API