Maryland Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
■ The following opinion was filed November 7, 1928:
Rosenberry, J.
It is the contention of the plaintiff here as it was in the court below and before the Industrial Commission that the determination of the question of whether or not a contract existed between the plaintiff insurance carrier and the employer, Pollock, was a nmtter over which the Industrial Commission had no jurisdiction.
Sec. 102.16 (1), Stats. 1925, provides:
“Any dispute or controversy concerning compensation under sections 102.03 to 102.34, inclusive, including any in which the state may be a party, shall be submitted to said *206in…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Thomas v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Blumberg v. American Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1951
- National Surety Corp. v. KempMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
- Degray v. Miller Bros. Con. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- Travelers Insurance Company v. SneddonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.